KogenBudo

The Real Importance of Reishiki in Koryu

Some time ago, I was at participating in training on the combative use of firearms. This is a new area of study for me, and I was among a number of others, all  of whom professionals, working with a borrowed weapon. During the practice, something rather disturbing occurred. It was resolved and the training continued. After that training block was finished, I was unloading my weapon to return it, still somewhat preoccupied by the previous event, rather than 100% focused on the firearm in my hand. I’d unloaded the magazine, and was jacking back the slide to check if there was a bullet in the chamber. The action was very stiff and I gripped the weapon firmly with my right hand to properly brace the action. To my horror, I realized I had unconsciously let my index finger wrap around the trigger. I froze, stopping my action. There was, in fact, a bullet in the chamber, and I would have fired off a round in God-knows-what-direct, if I hadn’t caught myself at the last moment.

Which leads to a discussion on koryu training. We are enacting quite a paradox, training to become proficient in killing other human beings using wooden replicas of archaic weapons. With the exception of a few individuals who own a shinken, few among us own – or have even handled – a real naginata, kusarigama, or yari. To the best of my knowledge, Nitta sensei, my Toda-ha Buko-ryu teacher, never held a real naginata in her hands. Because we will never fight another human being with one of these weapons that we so assiduously train, there is a danger that we will lapse into ‘mukei bunkazai (intangible cultural treasure) practice.’ By this, I mean the equivalent of collecting a fine Chippendale chair that would collapse if anyone ever sat upon it. Even worse than that is ‘martial dancing,’ the repetition of empty kata for, at ‘best,’ embu.

Paradoxically, this concern for valid combative integrity leads directly to that cliche phrase, ”budo begins with rei, and ends with rei.” This phrase always raised my hackles, bringing to mind the precious, ostentatious displays of so many of the poseurs I saw throughout the Japanese budo world: to recall Chushingura, a nest of Kira(s), not Asano(s). But recall my incident with the pistol. Rei is not just a bow to be polite, to display one’s sanctimony – rei is a codified set of behaviors to a) not give offense to armed individuals who, if offended, may not only be a danger to you, but to the cause that you are allied b) to properly handle weaponry so that it is safely managed, both in your own hands, and in passing it on to another person.

As to the former – offering proper respect to others – a koryu dojo should be maintained with ‘wolf-pack’ etiquette. Wolves, being predators, conserve energy. They are never stiff, unless ill or frightened. The pack centers around the alpha(s), and there is a clear hierarchy, based on age, strength and a number of other qualities, intangible, but real. Wolf-pack etiquette in the dojo should mean:

  • The dojo can be a place of laughter, at times, and certainly enjoyment, but one’s attention should never be away from the instructor and one’s seniors.
  • One’s behavior is determined by that of one’s instructor – if he or she is relaxed, so, too, you should be. But in the fraction of a moment that the instructor is focused, serious or otherwise in kamae,  you should flow into the same state without hesitation – indeed, without conscious intent. You have failed – absolutely – if your instructor is focused and you are still joking or otherwise casual. This should be regarded as the same level of failure as standing with your head above a barricade with incoming fire coming your way, because you are too wrapped up in whatever you are doing to realize that you are under attack. This is not because your instructor is ‘godlike,’ or otherwise your superior. Rather, your instructor’s behavior is a form of uketachi – you use this training to learn to be able to be similarly aware when it really matters.
  • If the instructor indicates something, it is always important. You shouldn’t need explanations for everything, or even direct orders. If the instructor, for example, states, “It’s a good idea to be further apart when the kata start” – this should become an obsession! You should never be corrected on this again. Every action puts your life on the line – if only in the abstract (and if you need an explanation of why this is important, when you’ll never fight with a yari, naginata, or sword, then you don’t belong in the ryu). When one of my teachers said something like, “sore wa chyotto. . . .” which means, “That’s a little . . ..” it was often up to us to finish the sentence. We knew, beyond a doubt, something was wrong. If we ignored her, why would she have any interest in further teaching us? Why would we merit being taught?
  • If seniors observe a teacher correcting a junior on an aspect of behavior, the teacher should never have to make that correction again, because the behavioral aspects of training within a dojo are immutable – it is now the responsibility of seniors to ensure that the teacher does not have to waste a moment’s time or energy concerned about this ever again.

Weapons handling. I have seen people hand a bokken over to another person grasping it by the blade; I’ve seen people untangle the chain of the kusarigama (admittedly an unwieldy instrument) clasping the blade in the crook of the arm or hanging the blade on their shoulder or neck; I’ve seen people casually stand with their hand on the blade of the naginata. The blade edge should not touch your flesh. Ever! I’ve seen people propping themselves up with the tip of the sword on the ground like a cane.  I have seen people casually stepping over weapons on the floor.  My question: Are you doing stick-fighting with oddly shaped pieces of wood, or are you doing kenjutsu? Naginatajutsu? Kusarigamajutsu?

There may be some variations among various dojo on how to hand a weapon from one person to another. But here are some essentials.

  • When you hand a weapon to another person, the blade edge should be in your own direction
  • Simultaneously make eye contact AND be conscious that both people have a grasp on the weapon before you let go of your grasp. There is a kokyu associated with the handing over of a weapon, very similar to the reishiki at the end of a kata where, after we lower our weapons, there is a moment of dynamic stillness – zanshin – and then the weapons and self are slightly relaxed and we move apart. The same thing should occur when handing the weapon from one person to another.
  • Weapons management is particularly difficult with chained weapons such as a kusarigama, but when you hand the weapon over, the chain should be arranged so that it is a) not twisted, tangled or knotted b) does not dangle. If you cannot manage the chain and fundo  in passing the weapon along, you obviously cannot manage it during practice.

Any time I have made a mistake in training – where the blade slid on my skin, where through one failure or another, I was struck, cut or stabbed by a training partner’s weapon – I would spend the night considering that I was dead. The only reason I could continue to breathe air is that I was using a training weapon rather than a real one.

Despite the fact that we will never use these weapons to cut down another human being, if we are not training for the purpose of learning how best to do so, practice in koryu is a lie. And a pointless lie at that. As far as your legacy is concerned, it should be of paramount importance to you that no one ever has legitimate grounds to question your ability – if such questions exist, one must train until they are eliminated. Beyond this, however, it is even more important that no one has legitimate grounds to question your behavior. Such behavior is not mere politesse – it is the essence of proper action among armed human beings.

No part of this material may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, without permission in writing from the author. However, you are welcome to share a link to this article on such social media as Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter.

Purchase Ellis Amdur’s Books On Budo & De-escalation of Aggression Here

Note: If any of my readers here find themselves grateful for access to the information in my essays, you can express your thanks in a way that would be helpful to me in turn. If you have ever purchased any of my books, please write a review – the option is there on Amazon as well as Kobo or iBook. To be sure, positive reviews are valuable in their own right, but beyond that, the number of reviews bumps the algorithm within the online retailer, so that the book in question appears to more customers. 

 

 

Previous

GUEST BLOG: Reflections on the Origin of Ueshiba Morihei’s Koshinage & The Relationship of Daito-ryu and Aikido Waza by John Driscoll

Next

Interview with Abe Toyoko of the Tendo-ryu

4 Comments

  1. Ellis Amdur

    Many years ago, I visited a public trap and skeet range.  It was a beautiful and well-organized facility.  The range held classes, offered shotguns for rent, and encouraged people to bring their friends for an enjoyable afternoon shooting clay targets that flew through the air or rolled and bounced over the ground.

    Shooters went out in groups of four to six.  A range-master accompanied each group.  The range-master would explain the challenges of each shooting station, and direct the release of the clays.  The range-master also explained and enforced the safety rules of the range.  The most important of these rules was that all guns were to point down-range at all times, whether loaded or not.  

    There was a group just ahead of mine, and its range-master was a stocky, reserved fellow.  His group included a boisterous individual who appeared, from his clothes and haircut, to be in his late 30’s.  But his bluster and sloppily casual bearing were more appropriate to a college “bro” at the beginning of a Saturday night frat party.  The range-master looked straight at him while delivering the safety rules.  

    The bro took his turn shooting.  He missed with both barrels, and turned away from the range, swinging his shotgun toward his group.  “Point that gun downrange!”, yelled the master.  The bro complied, but groused and grumbled, “What’s the problem, I fired it two times, there’s no shells left..”  The range-master replied, calmly and firmly, “Don’t do it again,” and led the next shooter forward.

    At the next station, the bro missed his first shot, but clipped a clay with his second.  He turned, exultant, toward his group.  “I got one!” he cried, again oblivious to the fact that he was pointing his weapon at his friends.  The range-master strode up to the bro, and without a word, hit him with a powerful right cross.  He was out before he hit the ground.

    The master picked up the bro’s shotgun, broke it open, and ejected both shells.  He turned to the group and said, “One at a time, please unload your guns.  Please return them and any unused ammunition to the office.  We will refund today’s fees in full.  Please tell your friend that he is not welcome at this facility again.  Thank you.”
    -posted on behalf of JIM SORRENTINO

    • Federico Calboli

      I am somewhat surprised by this story — it has a lot of feel good factor, but the range master shows remarkable lack of strategic foresight.

      The US being the country it is, that is, a country run by the rule of law, the best case scenario I see is a criminal prosecution for assault together with a civil suit for damages — prison plus bankrupcy. The bro was an idiot, that is for a fact, but swinging a firearm that has no live ammo anymore is a breach of the rules, not an invitation for a knock out punch in the head (being kicked off the range? sure. Instant physical punishment? I doubt the legal system might agree).

      Worse obviously is the possibility that the bro might have taken matter in his own hands in the form of a different firearm to be used at a different time, with a different target. I know some people might mention the need for a warrior to be alert at all times and whatnot, but personally I’d rather not have to worry that there might be someone out there with a gun planning to kill me or a member of my family.

      So I am conflicted. The story is poignant about why proper etiquette matters, and what might happen if we are not mindful to it. Yet I suspect the story might be even more poignant for for other, much worse, reasons.

  2. Walter Martindale

    Many years ago (1975) I was in a Canadian forces reserve summer training position, and we were in a live-fire exercise using a 9 mm submachine gun (600/minute rate of fire, full 32 round magazine). On walking up to the firing point, the sergeant in charge advised me that if, when I was on the firing point, he observed me with the muzzle pointing anywhere other than down range, he would quickly attempt to break another full magazine of ammunition across the back of my neck. In the U.S., it is a much more litigious society, but I suspect “bro” was discouraged from taking any action as he was in the wrong on the range. Every firearm should be treated as if it is loaded at all times whether or not it is known to be discharged. That way no accidents happen.

  3. Sorry to revive an old post:

    Yes I agree – the range officer punching the guy was just as bad as the bro. That is an amazing account, to be sure.

    Ranges – “shooting dojo” – are generally very strict in firearms safety rules. The reason for this is that often there is a range of people who attend public ranges, with varied levels of ability and awareness with firearms. It is similar on ranges with police officers, though officers in training can usually do more than on a private range (depending….) For instance, some ranges do not allow drawing and firing from the holster, or are arranged so that moving and shooting is not allowed. Sometimes it is a skill level thing – a SWAT team may do far more complex training and engage in activities that are disallowed for non-swat officers, and disallowed on public ranges. One example: on most ranges shooters are not allowed to face “up range” or to step off the firing line with a weapon in hand. This is not just avoiding “muzzling” or “lasering” people behind the firing line, no weapon can be in hand off the firing line. This is to ensure safety, and on a basic level it makes sense. Range officers often passionately and rigorously enforce this, even when a weapon is handled completely safely, and stepping off the line with a weapon in hand can mean getting kicked off a range, or disciplined. This is the most basic level of reishiki, and weapons etiquette.

    The problem is we will do that all the time when out in the world. In real world, in real time, you will be handling a weapon while moving amongst no-shoots, whether they are innocents or non-combatants, one’s partners, or even a suspect that has ceased to be a lethal threat. A problem with such square range rules is that they do not allow someone to practice weapons handling when in and amongst other people. This would be the next level of reishiki and weapons etiquette. Once a foundation in range-handling is laid, then there is handling in open environments. This is because there must be an observation that someone is “safe” with their own weapon before they can be trusted to operate amongst others, and to not present a danger to their peers.

    I have taken people off ranges three times. All were good people. One was a very experienced martial artist with extensive koryu background. He just ended up NOT treating his firearm the way he would a sword. As one person put it “he is not inculcated in firearms culture.” As we were training in a course of fire that involved manipulating a pistol close to the body, firing in contact with the body, and involved holstering and re-holstering, this lack of awareness was unacceptable and placed everyone else and himself at risk.

    Another time I did-invited someone from a class in which we were using blue guns- these are inert plastic firearms that don’t fire anything at all. The point was, they had to still be treated as “real.” The student showed a lack of basic handling knowledge and awareness, to include constantly placing his finger in the trigger guard. Without the basics, and despite the fact that we were using inert weapons, he had no business learning more complicated stuff until he could get the basics down. I did not want him to have the impression that he was “safe” to carry a weapon in public, perhaps draw it, perhaps use it to defend himself, in and amongst other people when he was clearly not so.

    Like with traditional reishiki, there is firearms etiquette for handling weapons, handing weapons to others, etc. that usually involve clearing the weapon, inspecting the chamber and mag well, and then offering the locked open chamber to the person you are handing it to for their inspection and verification as empty before passing the weapon over. Similarly, when engaging in force on force drills, safety checks clearing everyone of live weapons, magazines, and ammunition are conducted. Unfortunately, when these have been lacking, people have died in training when live weapons and live rounds made it into practice sessions.

    An inability to follow these basic guidelines is a prime indicator of lack of ability with weapons. It is a warning sign to those around that one is not ready for real world.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén