Among the chapters in Old School, is one entitled “Keppan: Blood Vows in Japanese Martial Traditions.” I’m very happy with that chapter, for what it is worth, but I think it is fair to say that I leave the impression that kishōmon were always a solemn rite, one properly accompanied by massing clouds, and lightning flickering on the horizon.
It is certainly true that such an oath could be the assumption of a deep responsibility, but it was also true that they were simply the generic way that one made promises in the Japanese feudal period, similar to those in the West avowing such phrases as “So help me G-d,” “On my mother’s grave,” or “On my children’s lives.” Sometimes it had as little weight as a “pinkie swear.” I recently discovered a pledge by a cadre of young bushi, members of a faction of Araki-ryū that reveals a far more human side of things.
Shinmon: Oath Before the Gods
Having respectfully requested instruction in the Araki-ryū arts of torite, jūjutsu, sword-drawing, staff, rope, spear, glaive, and military usage, and being now earnestly set upon the chūdan and the innermost teachings, we respectfully request these as well. For this reason we once again, on this occasion, set our blood seals and present [this oath].
- We shall not sharply criticize the shortcomings of other schools. We have been told repeatedly that all of us alike must be restrained in this, and we acknowledge it. Further, when we are asked ⟨whether such and such is so⟩ by those of other schools, we shall answer in the manner proper to this school. Should there be unreasonable persons who press for a contest, we shall report the matter, consult among our fellow students, and only then proceed to a contest.
- We acknowledge that quarrels, disputes, heavy drinking, discourtesy and the like are not to be engaged in. Toward outsiders, needless to say, and toward our fellow students as well, we have been instructed to permit nothing unreasonable, and we shall be strictly careful of it. Should we in any way act against what we have been told, and our standing in the school be suspended, we shall harbor not the slightest resentment.
The articles above we shall strictly observe. Should we act contrary to them, may we incur the unseen punishment of the gods of war, of the great and lesser deities of the sixty-odd provinces of Japan. Accordingly we set our blood seals, as stated above.
Kansei 8, the year hinoe-tatsu [1796], first month, on an auspicious day
This is followed by the signatures of six men.
Let us consider the implications of this. They surely offered an oath upon their entry into the school – that was the custom. They already made promises under the auspices of the gods. Now, some years later, their instructor viewed it as necessary that they made another oath – the fear of the deities was not sufficient, and evidently, their punishment had not yet descended upon them.
The text reads: “We have been told repeatedly . . .” “We acknowledge . . .” Obviously, there have been . . . problems, not unexpected among young men who are studying how to fight. In short, we have a cadre of young men, probably in their late teens or early twenties, who were obviously brawling with members from other schools at the slightest pretext: provoking conflicts by talking down to them, or responding to a question in a manner like this: “What???!!!! How do we do kesagiri? I’ll show you exactly how, you [******].” One can imagine such men standing in the entry way of another school, laughing, poorly imitating their practice, bumping shoulders on the street, spilling a drink on someone’s kimono sleeve as they passed them in a tavern. It’s a fair assumption they were probably abusing the local shopowners (particularly in taverns), getting drunk and fighting amongst themselves. Their instructor (and seniors) were receiving reports of all of this and apologizing for them
So their instructor sits them down and has them write out a new blood oath, in essence, saying, “We promise, under penalty of destruction from the most august of deities, to stop acting like knuckleheads.”
There is a poignant note concerning one of the young men, Mitsui Kakuemon, written in another hand, surely some time later, which indicates that the lesson surely was taken to heart. “This man received the school’s licence during a time when he held no official post. While he was seconded to the vanguard corps (sakitegumi 先手組 – originally an advance-guard bow and gun unit, then in the Edo period, a kind of police/guard unit, armed with bō, swords, jutte, and when necessary, spears), he died of illness while serving as instructor.”
We can imagine his instructor , late one evening, perhaps after receiving a letter, or being otherwise notified, pulling out this vow, and writing this note, thinking of a young, hot-blooded youth who grew up to be a fine man, then lost too soon.
Note: If anyone finds themselves grateful for access to the information in the essays published on this site, you can express your thanks in a way that would be helpful to me in turn. It would be most welcome if you were to purchase one or more of my books, be it those on martial traditions, tactical communication or fiction. In addition, if you have ever purchased any of my books, please write a review – the option is there on Amazon as well as Kobo or iBook. To be sure, positive reviews are valuable in their own right, but beyond that, the number of reviews bumps the algorithm within the online retailer, so that the book in question appears to more customers.
Ellis Amdur
Subsequent to the posting of the essay above, an individual wrote a comment on social media, taking apparent offense, stating: “I could put together an article about this from about 300 Ryuha. The linking of the person being awarded a license to the diety(s) connected to a ryuha I would not pass off as superficial in nature.” I pointed out that he apparently misread the entire intent of the post. But to illustrate the all-purpose nature of keppan, I offer this one of a buffoon in love [That he was also a great warlord doesn’t change the fact that he, like most of us when clouded by lust, are rather idiotic). I post it with full citations, in case anyone doubts its validity: Here is the rather well known “Love Oath to Kasuga Gensuke” [Kōsaka Masanobu]
From: Harunobu [Takeda Shingen, then twenty-six years old]”
誓詞之意趣者
一 弥七郎にたびたびよりをかけ候へ共、むし気と申候間、不入及力候、実不申候。
一 弥七郎伽に寝させ申事、これまた更になし。
一 昼夜弥七郎と言ひ、不時に不交事、前々の通り、さらに他心なし。
右、何れも嘘偽りの事候はば、当国一二三宮、殊には富士・白山、殊には飯縄大権現、諏訪上下大明神、別して氏神の罰を蒙るべきものなり、仍て件の如し。
天文十五年七月五日 晴信(花押)
春日源助 殿
Reference List Entry:
武田晴信. (2002). 春日源助宛武田晴信誓詞 (文書番号 172). 柴辻俊六・黒田基樹 (編), 戦国遺文 武田氏編 (第1巻, 82頁). 東京堂出版. (原本は1546年発行). In-Text Citation: (Takeda, 1546/2002)
Matters of the Sworn Oath:
一 It is true that I have repeatedly made romantic advances toward Yashichirō in the past, but he refused me, claiming a stomachache. Thus, nothing came of it.
一 It is absolutely not the case that I have ever shared a bed with Yashichirō for sexual intimacy.
一 I have not engaged in any unscheduled or inappropriate interactions with Yashichirō by day or night. As before, I have absolutely no interest in anyone else but you.
Should any of the above statements prove false, let me be punished by the first, second, and third shrines of this province, especially by the Great Bodhisattva of Fuji and Hakusan, the Great Incarnation of Izuna, the Upper and Lower Shrines of Suwa Daimyōjin, and most particularly by my own ancestral clan deities. Thus we swear.
July 5, 1546
Harunobu [Monogram]
To Lord Kasuga Gensuke
Reference List Entry:
Leupp, G. P. (1995). Male colors: The construction of homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan. Princeton University Press. In-Text Citation: (Leupp, 1995)
I will add a small summation of Leupp’s book because many people, idolizers of the samurai, will perhaps be rather upset at the rather general ubiquity of their ambi-sexuality, particularly in regards to adolescent males.
[Leupp argues that male same-sex relations (nanshoku) in Tokugawa Japan were socially constructed through nurture rather than being an innate biological identity.Instead of exclusive homosexuality, pervasive bisexuality was the societal norm, allowing men to fluidly pursue both male partners and traditional family marriages.These traditions historically originated within elite Buddhist monasteries and samurai warrior networks before diffusing into the rising urban commoner class. Furthermore, these relationships were strictly asymmetrical, governed by age-stratified hierarchies between adult men and distinctively styled adolescent youths.]