KogenBudo

A Review of UCHIDESHI: Walking with the Master: A Book by Jacques Payet

Japanese martial arts, as codified systems known as ryuha was developed in the Edo Period (1603 – 1868 CE). Also known as the Tokugawa era, this was perhaps the most successful totalitarian state ever developed. Through an elaborate system of checks-and-balances, the Tokugawa family, in the role of shogun, ruled a vast archipelago, comprised of separate feudal domains. Unlike Europe, they were able to maintain this essentially feudal federalism even with the rise of an economy based on the capitalism of the merchant class.

Society was ordered among four major classes (with any number of subclasses, “outclasses” and outcastes as well). The four classes were ordered in terms of prestige as: warrior, peasant, craftsman, merchant. However, in terms of power and actual social roles, things were rather different.

  • The bushi (warrior) bore two swords, but aside from ‘police actions’ in routing thousands of peasant revolts, few otherwise used their weapons. These warriors certainly participated in no wars. They functioned as a combination of armed bureaucrats and tax collectors.
  • When we think of peasants, we imagine impoverished individuals sunk knee deep in the muck of rice paddies, and this was true for many. Some peasants, however, were wealthy landowners, complete with tenant farmers on their own land.
  • In modern times, we think of craftsmen as remarkable people, able to combine art and function in hand-crafted objects – as far as social status, however, they were poorly regarded by those for whom they provided their exquisite objects.
  • And the merchants, regarded with contempt, were by the mid-Edo, the most powerful class in Japan in all but military matters. They drove the development of culture, and controlled the economy of the entire nation, as well as individual feudal domains.

Martial arts were essentially an activity which upheld this social structure. Bushi trained in martial arts, in part to legitimize their definition of being a warrior class. The schools inculcated certain values and a way of using the mind; they also prepared warriors for duels, a rare but distinct possibility. By the mid-Edo, well-to-do peasants and merchants enrolled in martial arts dojos in increasing numbers—in fact, in many locale, they outnumbered bushi in most dojos, except those called otome-ryu that the feudal domain had defined as exclusive to the domain’s bushi.

Among the values that ryuha imparted to their enrollees was that loyalty was an absolute value—ultimately, this meant loyalty to one’s feudal lord, but this was enacted, in microcosm, within the dojo. Lest their be any mistake, if there was ever a conflict of loyalty between the demands of one’s feudal lord and one’s martial arts teacher, the former was absolutely, unquestionably more important.

Few students of martial ryuha were full-time. Merchants had to turn over money and goods, peasants had to farm and bushi had a number of responsibilities that took up most of their time. Those passionate about martial arts were surely few, and did the bulk of training on their own time. That said, some teachers had true disciples, who, for a period of time, perhaps at the dispensation of their feudal lord, devoted themselves to a martial arts instructor. These disciples are described as pervasively loyal to their instructor. In personal correspondence, John Stevens wrote: “During a snowstorm, Sakakibara Kenkichi and his otomo Yamada Jirokichi were walking back home after teaching at the military academy, when the thong of Sakakibara’s geta snapped. Yamada was able to check his master’s fall while simultaneously slipping off his own geta and sliding it under Sakakibara’s foot for him to step into. It is said Sakakibara designed Yamada the 15th Headmaster of the Jikishinkage-Ryu largely because of this incident; such an act demonstrated that Yamada was the ultimate uchideshi.”

How often did such master-student relationships occur? Did this event even occur? One can understand, however, how such tales served as indoctrination towards the development of such pervasively loyal and attentive individuals. Such a person, with his (or her) attention 100% upon the needs of his feudal lord or other superiors in rank was essential for Edo society. One achieved glory through service, not through individual attainment.

The advent of the Meiji period (1868-1912) was not only an explosion of new cultural forms, but the near collapse, if not destruction of much of the old. Loyalty to one’s feudal lord was replaced with loyalty to the Emperor, who was re-viewed as an embodiment of divinity through ‘state Shinto.’ This was certainly a paradox, as concurrently, there was a fascination with European cultural forms, and an abandonment of much that was Japanese: among the latter was the transmutation of traditional martial arts into modern forms, centered around a combination of competition and training of a militant spirit in the service of Japan. Many of the older ryuha were abandoned.

It was at this time that Takeda Sokaku appeared, with his reworking of the traditional martial arts that he had learned into something new that he eventually called Daito-ryu. Takeda is often (improperly) viewed as a traditionalist, but he was a revolutionary. He pioneered teaching in brief seminars, traveling from one venue to another, and he taught by applying techniques upon his students, rather than the traditional manner where the teacher (uke or uchidachi) taught by having the students apply techniques on them. Takeda demanded that his close students enact the kind of pervasive attention to him that we read above in the story of Sakakibara and Yamada (incidentally, Takeda was allegedly a student of Sakakibara for some period of time). Part of his teaching methodology was that his students had to be exquisitely sensitive to what he wanted, twenty-four hours a day, striving to achieve an almost psychic ability to intuit his needs. One can imagine how this sensitivity could possibly be transferred to other aspects of one’s life, most importantly, combat. If attending to one’s teacher requires the same level of attention and sensitivity that is necessary in a mission behind enemy lines, this would be a very powerful training tool.

Takeda’s student, Ueshiba Morihei maintained the same teaching style with his own close students. Among the stories most commonly told are:

  • Carrying his luggage through a crowded train station, with Ueshiba sliding through the crowd to board the train which, if the baggage-laden disciple could not catch up, would leave without him.
  • Preparing his bath at the perfect temperature, which the disciple had to know without actually touching the water, because his skin oil would contaminate the pristine bath. [NOTE: Terry Dobson told of preparing Ueshiba’s bath along with overly-serious Kanai Mitsunari and just when they thought everything was right, Ueshiba appeared and genially demanded that Terry get in the bath before him, which Terry happily did, Kanai looking daggers at him.]
  • At public demonstrations, Ueshiba would be wandering the stage, talking about gods efflorescing into the cosmos, and how he, through aiki, ordered that cosmos into proper balance, and the correct disciple would have to instantaneously know to <ATTACK!> right then, with just the attack that Ueshiba wanted to illustrate his point.

Among the students who experienced this type of education most intensively was Shioda Gozo. Shioda was the privileged son of a physician, one who was an elite member of society, and very involved in prewar right-wing causes. Shioda was a physically tiny man, but apparently very strong: the great judoka, Kimura Masahiko, who attended Takushoku University with him, said that Shioda would always beat him in arm wrestling. Shioda was one of Ueshiba’s sotodeshi for one year; he did not reside in the dojo full-time, though he frequently slept there. By the second year of his training, he became a full-time uchideshi. As a young man, Shioda sounds like a ‘class clown:’ he trained seriously—very seriously—and he idolized Ueshiba Morihei, but at the same time, he was irreverent, reportedly making fun of Omoto-kyo chants, and getting fellow disciple Shirata Rinjiro to sneak out of the dojo after hours, to go to the red-light districts.

Shioda had an odd ‘Zelig-like’ existence during the 1930’s and 1940’s. He was ‘everywhere and nowhere.’ He was arrested near the location of the 2-2-6 incident, the attempted coup d’etat against the Japanese government (and it was never clear what he was doing there. It was suspected that he was lending some kind of support for the revolutionaries). He did not serve in the military in the second world war; rather, he was seconded to various military men in China and Southeast Asia, doing quite well for himself (in Indonesia, he had his own personal zoo). But what he was doing for these men was obscure, nor was it clear how he, unlike almost all of his fellow deshi, managed to avoid military service without being considered a shirker or a coward. What it means  is that he was a significant ‘player’ of some sort, working behind the scenes, in the service of some very powerful entities.

After the end of the Second World War, he led a group of individuals in strike-breaking activities at the behest of various business owners, and in the 1950’s, opened his aikido dojo, the Yoshinkan. At that time, his teacher, Ueshiba Morihei was mostly residing in the rural community of Iwama and the Tokyo dojo, led by his son, Ueshiba Kisshomaru, had only a few members. Shioda never regarded himself, at least publicly, as separating from Ueshiba’s aikido; he, one of the highest ranked aikidoka in the world, opened a dojo to teach when there was little else available.

Up to this point, Shioda had led a charmed life, making up his own rules, even under his own teacher’s leash. Part of Shioda’s charm was his ability to act impeccably with his teacher, yet know when it was OK to make fun and have fun—in just the right proportion. However, now that he had his own school, he did not structure it along the lines of his own rather individualistic personality. He codified a strict curriculum based on certain basic movements/exercises that had to be done the same way, no matter what body size one had. These exercises engrain a Yoshinkan style on all its students. Everyone moves much the same. This is not criticism on my part—rather, the Yoshinkan imposes a set of rigorous exercises that develop a strong lower body, one that enables the practitioner to move rapidly and precisely through the turns and pivots required for aikido. Techniques, too, were taught in the same manner. [NOTE: In one chapter, Payet briefly describes Shioda’s “Black Belt” class, where he strove to teach his version of aiki;  Payet describes what Shioda did as being mysterious, nearly impossible to understand. At the same time, Shioda was nearly unique among teachers of aiki, in his honest effort to explicitly teach his understanding of this higher level.]

Another area that Shioda codified was the ‘pervasive service’ model I have previously described as part of the requirements of Takeda Sokaku and Ueshiba Morihei. For Takeda and Ueshiba, the rules of attendance were never formally laid out; this was a training of intuition. Although there was never a ‘rulebook’ in the Yoshinkan, uchideshi were quickly informed of all the rules necessary to serve the dojo and specifically, serve Shioda himself. Sometimes, like preparing Shioda’s bath, for example, a senior would model the behavior several times and then the junior would do the work under the senior’s eye—then the junior was on his own.

And this was the dojo that a callow young man, Jacques Payet, entered in 1980. Payet first commuted to the dojo, was invited to live there (on probation), and then, after participating in the infamous police training course, he was invited to become an uchideshi.  (The police training courses is described with a goofy outsider’s eye in Robert Twigger’s  Angry White Pajamas).

Payet’s book, UCHIDESHI: Walking with the Master, describes the eccentric world that Shioda created, where, for example, a telephone in the dojo was never allowed to ring more than once (and one disciple, noticing that a tiny light would illuminate on the receiver before the first ring, would leap for the phone before it sounded), or an uchideshi, waiting outside the door of Shioda’s bath, would know exactly when to enter to wash the master’s back. This is not a book that spends much time describing how-to advance in physical skill: there is relatively little description on technical development, or the aikido techniques themselves, except in passing. Rather, it is the story of a progression within an individual through the training of intuition in order function perfectly within an arbitrary system.

What I mean by ‘arbitrary’ can be illustrated by comparing the demands for survival upon a polar Inuit of a generation ago, or a !Kung, living in the Kalahari Desert: these are stark and clear. If one deviated from what was best suited—only suited—for that environment, one would die. For the Inuit, the ability to recognize, at a glance, the difference between a pile of snow and a polar bear, humped upon the ice with one white paw covering her dark nose, had to be instantaneous. Similarly for the !Kung, recognizing a slight discoloration in sand that indicated that there might be water beneath the surface had to occur as one was running after wounded prey. It might be the last water in many kilometers. The requirements for the Yoshinkan student, however, were not based on biological survival within an environment from which one could not separate oneself. But despite its arbitrary nature, they tried to replicate the same pressure on the individual so a similar intuitive ability would be developed. There was no risk to life or limb—it merely felt that way, once indoctrinated. The Yoshinkan uchideshi had to be aware of the timbre and energy that one yelled “OSU!” to a superior, or the precise spacing that one’s senior’s shoes needed to be placed at the entryway when he was leaving. This, therefore, was a lifestyle in which one accepted an arbitrary social structure, established to achieve intuition by the absolute adherence to a range of activities centered around subservience to the wishes of Shioda Gozo.

Payet tells his story with humility. He does not defend himself, as some might, with a polemic about how this method of training is requisite to become a ‘true’ martial artist. Rather, in the tradition of a natural phenomenologist, he simply tells what the experience was like for him, an unprepared and naïve young man. What may be hard for the reader to grasp in my description above, is that Payet does not describe himself as obsequious—rather, he has the wide-eyed openness of a baby. The baby drinks in this strange world within which he or she has been thrown by birth; Payet did the same in the strange world within which he entered by choice.

Perhaps the most important point in this book is that if one has the engrained habit of intuitive attention, then one has the possibility of absorbing information that one’s teacher himself/herself can’t explain. Often, expert athletes simply have found that beautiful line towards efficient powerful action through simply sensing what feels right in the body. Asked to explain it, they are like the centipede asked by the fox, “With which leg do you start moving?” At which point, the centipede is frozen. But just as a baby learns to feed herself or walk with simple wide-eyed attention, Payet became a remarkably skilled martial artist (I’ve seen him) through picking up with a kind of osmosis what his teachers were doing. This osmosis (‘mirroring’) was surely enhanced by the environment he was in.

I very much recommend this book to practitioners of traditional and modern Japanese martial arts. I view Shioda’s system as somewhat unique, somewhat eccentric, but it was based on principles universal within Japanese culture, and in particular, Japanese martial arts. Beyond all else, Payet himself exemplifies the mind of one who will achieve high skill, even mastery, where, unguarded, he accepts the world he is in and absorbs what it has to offer through his skin as much as through his intellect.

UCHIDESHI: Walking with the Master, Jacques Payet, Shindokan Books

No part of this material may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, without permission in writing from the author. However, you are welcome to share a link to this article on such social media as Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter. 

Purchase Books By Ellis Amdur Here

NOTE: IF ANY OF MY READERS HERE FIND THEMSELVES GRATEFUL FOR ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION IN MY ESSAYS, YOU CAN EXPRESS YOUR THANKS IN A WAY THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO ME IN TURN. IF YOU HAVE EVER PURCHASED ANY OF MY BOOKS, PLEASE WRITE A REVIEW – THE OPTION IS THERE ON AMAZON AS WELL AS KOBO OR IBOOK. TO BE SURE, POSITIVE REVIEWS ARE VALUABLE IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, BUT BEYOND THAT, THE NUMBER OF REVIEWS BUMPS THE ALGORITHM WITHIN THE ONLINE RETAILER, SO THAT THE BOOK IN QUESTION APPEARS TO MORE CUSTOMERS.

 

Previous

Guest Blog: Martial Arts of the Kevsureti by Mike Cherba

Next

A Critical Engagement With Piotr Masztalerz’s THE KINGDOM OF DUST

7 Comments

  1. It still appals me that we had to go through these experiences as naïve individuals at the mercy of those in positions of influence, status, wealth or power, who perpetuated these practices as a method of high payment for acquiring dubious skills, knowledge or connections, in the process often becoming indoctrinated, potentially perpetuating the same paradigm. It’s important that these experiences are documented by the exceptionally talented few who made it it out the other side with something intact, as Sensei Payet has done here, as even in these more enlightened times the same dangers exist, are as unwarranted, unnecessary and just as abusive.

    • Ellis Amdur

      I hope Jacques Payet will comment, but I should certainly reply, as your statement is based, I believe, on my review. Although I never would have chosen to follow a martial arts path such as the Yoshinkan, I think your statement is not really warranted. The Yoshinkan is not a cult—it is a group that draws the kind of people who are drawn to the Yoshinkan (I know that’s a tautology, but it’s also true). From time immemorial, humanity has realized that the only way to achieve remarkable power is through shugyo of some kind.

      Shamans must undergo near death experiences to find the gateway to other worlds, and in most 1st people cultures, initiation into manhood is a terrible, even torturous affair. But in a world where any mistake could be death, we humans found a traumatic bond was necessary to create the kind of group solidarity so that one would die for one’s fellows (imagine the temptation to run away when in a group attack against a buffalo or mammoth). Also, rites of passage are scary, perhaps painful – and this causes the person involved to pay attention to – and remember – everything they were taught. One mistake might result in ostracism (a kind of death). And extreme experiences cause the nervous system to grow to survive them. This happens naturally in the severe world of nature; those of us blessed with more security must impose privation in order to grow the same way.

      What Takeda, Ueshiba and Shioda did was create a civilized version of a natural initiation. With an escape route. Imagine you were in Takeda Sokaku’s entourage, and he started screeching at you for one thing or another, or even raised his walking stick to strike you. Unlike a tribesman, for whom his group is his entire world, you could simply walk away. Payet notes several individuals who simply left the Yoshinkan. One was absolutely free as an uchideshi – one could leave at any time.

      Having undergone a very different tutelage in Japan (with, I must say, the same severity), I would never have wanted to spend a day training at the Yoshinkan. But in no sense can I see this as “high payment” – in fact, the Yoshinkan gave its uchideshi free room-and-board. And some of the best training in the entire world of aikido. As I read the book, the experience that Payet went through (and similar ones that other friends in the Yoshinkan world went through) sounded unpleasant to me. But abusive? I see it in the same light I see ballet, with dancing on point, for some, a horribly painful experience; dancing with injuries; dancing with partners who are unsafe or even smell bad. It may “read unpleasant,” and be nothing I’d want to do – but when one can walk away, I cannot see it as abusive or even problematic.

      One of my first mentors in martial arts, Harvey Koenigsburg told me that he was at an aikido summer camp led by several famous shihan, and Harvey, one of Yamaha Yoshimitsu’s senior students, did not attend the training hour(s) of another shihan. That man went to Harvey and demanded to know why he wasn’t taking his class. Harvey looked him right in the eyes and said calmly, “I don’t like to be hurt, sensei.” Bowed, and left the man standing.

      • Dewitt L Cooper Jr Shidokan DoJo Jac, Fla

        As a Aikido believer at age 63 I wished in time past that I would have had this opportunity to experience this type of training I was Airborne trained in my younger days and often think about training now at my age with some Aikidoest that would take my situation at hand and retrain me with respect of what I bring to the mat. Just something to think about.

  2. I agree with Ellis Amdur. I and all the deshi were free to leave at any time and we were all willing to go through the process, whatever unpleasant it was , because we trusted that there were wonderful value and benefits beyond such training. Personally I certainly do not regret it , it made what I am today.

  3. Galen Nishioka

    Of course this type of training is not for everyone. It may be unimaginable for many. But for a few it is more than than training, it is life and the way to live.

  4. Chris Leblanc

    Perhaps the real test is that one is free to walk away. Even those that want to be SEALs, at BUD/S, can ring the bell….

  5. David Rubens

    As someone who knows both Jacques Payet and Ellis Amdur on a personal basis, as well as having been a student of the Yoshinkan Hombu dojo in the period when Payet Sensei was an uchi-deshi, and then having myself having spent two and a half years as an uchi-deshi in the period immediately after Jacques’ leaving, I would like to make a number of comments.

    Firstly as a number of people have commented, it was an entirely voluntary relationship and there was the freedom to leave at any time.

    Secondly, it was an opportunity to become immersed in a culture and structure that was almost unique in its intensity. In that sense, it was no different from any other closed-off institution dedicated to the development of excellence, whether it was a Buddhist monastery, Christian retreat, elite military unit, Bolshoi Ballet or Chinese State Circus (all institutions which are at the same time both open and elitist, dedicated to excellence but one acquired though what might seem to an outsider to be brutalistic regimes).

    As someone who was taught by Payet Sensei, and inspired by him to apply to be accepted as an uchi-deshi, it was clear that not only was the life of an uchi-deshi one of training and discipline, but also one of joy and deep significance. The fact that one lived in the dojo meant that there was in a very real sense no ‘other life’ other than the dojo experience. (As an uchi-deshi, when I was sent to the post-office, or the flower shop to buy the leaves for the dojo shrine, I did so running in zori and dogi).

    At that time, in the mid-1980’s, the atmosphere in the Koganei dojo, and certainly for the uchi-deshis, was very different to what was later experienced in the Shinjuku dojo. It was almost literally like entering an aikido monastery. It was a life dedicated to the training of Aikido and the service to Gozo Shioda Sensei. Everything revolved around those two central points. In that sense, there was a purity to the uchi-deshi life that was almost transcendental in its simplicity.

    One of my clearest memories is of sitting in seiza one morning, waiting for the 10.00 class to start. It was an early spring day, the warm sun bringing its own pleasure as the marking of a new cycle, in both nature and the dojo (the dojo cycle tends to go from April-March, to mark the Senshusei course). At that moment I had a real epiphany in its truest sense – to have a sudden realization or to have a glimpse of underlying reality. I realised that at that moment everyone else I knew in the world was going to work, or worrying about bills or thinking about their next problem – and I was waiting to train in the Yoshinkan Hombu Dojo in Tokyo with Takeno Sensei, and I realised that at that exact moment that my life had real meaning, and that I was, beyond words to explain, happy.

    The fact that over thirty years later my experience as an uchi-deshi continues to shape the way I interact with the world (and with the challenges that it throws up), is just a small example of the power and influence that those experiences had then, and continue to have until now.

    I feel blessed to have had the opportunity to have had those experiences, and have a feeling of 義理 (debt of honour) to Payet Sensei until today for the influence he had on me at that time.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén